- From: Daniel Elenius <daele@ida.liu.se>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 11:39:09 -0700
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
How about... 1) Changing the name of SimpleProcess to AbstractProcess 2) Removing the expandsTo property 3) Changing the range of realizedBy to Process Is there any credible scenario where we want to have one atomic and one composite process linked to the same simple (abstract) process? Why does it matter that they are composite/atomic? My suggestion means there could be different degrees of abstract-ness, as an AbstractProcess can be (partly) realizedBy another AbstractProcess. The concrete process in the end of the chain (if any) can be either atomic or composite. Daniel
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 18:39:24 UTC