W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > March 2005

Re: suggestion about owl reasoner

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:53:03 -0500
Message-Id: <8ccb49e9acec409e98ab2cb0cff02264@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>, "N0088724" <dhavalkumar.thakker@students.ntu.ac.uk>
To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>

On Mar 11, 2005, at 9:24 AM, Ian Horrocks wrote:

> You could also take a look at FaCT, FaCT++ and OilEd:
>
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/FaCT
> http://owl.man.ac.uk/factplusplus
> http://oiled.man.ac.uk/

[snip]

Good point.

I should also mention the seldom mentioned BOR:
	http://www.ontotext.com/bor/

Racer (+ oiled or protege) is probably still the over all champ (i.e., 
fastest for the most functionality, even if it may now lose on speed 
for some things to FaCT++ and on functionality to Pellet and maybe 
BOR), but its source is not available.

Cheers,
Bijan
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 14:53:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:11:00 GMT