W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > July 2005

Re: WSDL-S's action and related WS-Addressing and WSDL discussions and concepts

From: KUNAL VERMA <verma@cs.uga.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:42:25 -0400 (EDT)
To: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0507011135320.4659-100000@atlas.cs.uga.edu>

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Carine Bournez wrote:

> > 2. In WSDL 2.0, where there is no explicit message construct (unless I am
> >    totally wrong about this), how can we make it a message level property.
> What about input and output?

According to the schema of operation in WSDL 2.0 available at [1]:
    An operation can have 0 or more inputs and outputs, thus implying that
    there is not a 1 to 1 correspondence between an input and a message.

While, at a SOAP level, it makes perfect sense to add action as a message
level property, doing so at WSDL level might lead to some tricky issues.
(e.g. do we add "action" to all inputs and outputs of an operation)

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050510/#InterfaceMessageReference_XMLRep

Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 15:42:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:54:15 UTC