W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > October 2004

RE: xml:base in OWL-S files

From: Jeff Lansing <jeff@polexis.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:22:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CE99F7FDC4698C4C8D77BC4EE574F55421DAF5@ibox.polexis.com>
To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, "public-sws-ig" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Isn't this "#" the same "#" that is used to delimit a URL from a fragment/anchor identifier that might
   follow it?
 
Jeff

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Bijan Parsia [mailto:bparsia@isr.umd.edu] 
	Sent: Thu 10/14/2004 7:36 PM 
	To: 'public-sws-ig' 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: xml:base in OWL-S files
	
	


	On Oct 14, 2004, at 10:26 PM, Daniel Elenius wrote:
	
	>
	> So, can we conclude that hash is slightly wrong but harmless? ;)
	
	No.
	
	It's not in any way wrong. It doesn't lead to errors.
	
	It is a bit misleading as most people don't know the three different
	resolution rules for relative URIs in RDF/XML (I'll add that the same
	document reference resolution rule in RDF/XML is different, IIRC, to
	the one in the URI spec. Ick :))
	
	So, you might label it bad style.
	
	Cheers,
	Bijan Parsia.
	
	
	

Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 22:22:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:58 GMT