RE: xml:base in OWL-S files

Isn't this "#" the same "#" that is used to delimit a URL from a fragment/anchor identifier that might
   follow it?
 
Jeff

 -----Original Message----- 
 From: Bijan Parsia [mailto:bparsia@isr.umd.edu] 
 Sent: Thu 10/14/2004 7:36 PM 
 To: 'public-sws-ig' 
 Cc: 
 Subject: Re: xml:base in OWL-S files
 
 


 On Oct 14, 2004, at 10:26 PM, Daniel Elenius wrote:
 
 >
 > So, can we conclude that hash is slightly wrong but harmless? ;)
 
 No.
 
 It's not in any way wrong. It doesn't lead to errors.
 
 It is a bit misleading as most people don't know the three different
 resolution rules for relative URIs in RDF/XML (I'll add that the same
 document reference resolution rule in RDF/XML is different, IIRC, to
 the one in the URI spec. Ick :))
 
 So, you might label it bad style.
 
 Cheers,
 Bijan Parsia.