W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > October 2004

Re: OWL-S in use?

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 21:33:07 -0400
Message-Id: <8231B9B1-166E-11D9-9B73-000D93C1F7A6@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
To: Robert Mark Bram <relaxedrob@optusnet.com.au>

On Oct 4, 2004, at 9:10 PM, Robert Mark Bram wrote:

>
> Hi All!
>
> Are there any examples of OWL-S in currently in use? I have found a 
> few OWL ontologies on SchemaWeb, and was hoping that some people have 
> started using them..
> http://www.schemaweb.info/schema/BrowseSchema.aspx

Do you mean OWL-S or OWL?

> Also, are there any tools for OWL-S developed yet? I saw some for 
> DAML+OIL on Dave Beckett's resource list:
> http://www.ilrt.bristol.ac.uk/discovery/rdf/resources/

This seems like OWL.

Both OWL-S and OWL are in use. One example of OWL is exactly OWL-S!

Given the forum, I'll reply about OWL-S.

OWL-S is being used by, e.g., Fujistu (for their Task Computing project 
http://taskcomputing.org/).

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2004 01:33:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:57 GMT