W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > November 2004

Re: OWL-S version 1.1 now available

From: Ian Dickinson <ian.dickinson@hp.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:42:19 +0000
Message-ID: <419F1F8B.3030604@hp.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: David Martin <martin@AI.SRI.COM>, public-sws-ig <public-sws-ig@w3.org>

Bijan Parsia wrote:
>> [David Martin]
>> Very good point.  I don't know the answer to this either, but we'll 
>> look in to it.

> WSDL 2.0 supplies a mapping from the qnames to canonical URIs for 
> components (using a set of xpointer schemes). We could do one for WSDL 
> 1.1 as well, I suppose.

I haven't looked at WSDL 2.0 yet, and after reading Rich Salz's rant [1] 
I'm not inclined to for the time being!  But if they have specified a 
qname<->uri mapping, and it's consistent with wsdl 1.1, then it seems a 
good idea to refer to it from owl-s. Because without doubt wsdl 1.1 will 
be around for a long time yet.  We still have DAML users wanting support 
on the Jena forum, despite the length of time that OWL has been around 
(and the fact that OWL is a better specification than DAML). WSDL 1.1 is 
far more prevalent than DAML ever was.


[1] http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2004/11/17/salz.html
Received on Saturday, 20 November 2004 10:42:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:54:13 UTC