Re: 2 questions about perform, data-flow, and OWL-S 1.0

• From: Jeff Dalton <jeff@inf.ed.ac.uk>
• Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 21:04:27 +0100 (BST)
• To: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
• Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
• Message-ID: <1085083467.40ad0f4bda4fb@mail.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Thanks.  I think I understand that answer, though I'm still
not sure what I should do to express the data-flow on OWL-S 1.0
(other than the approach I suggested).

Quoting Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>:

> > Let's say that T#P has inputs T#inText and T#inLang,
> > outputs T#outText and T#outLang.
> 
> It seems to me that 'outLang' should be an input (what I called
> TargetLang), unless it represents T#P's best guess about what the
> target is.

Yes, you're right: outLang should be an input.  Having it
as an output was due to some careless editing on my part.

-- Jeff

Received on Thursday, 20 May 2004 16:05:00 UTC