- From: Jeff Dalton <jeff@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 23:19:47 +0100 (BST)
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Quoting Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>: > > [Jeff Dalton] > > > Split+Join is described as follows in > > > > http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/owl-s.html > > > > Here the process consists of concurrent execution of a bunch > > of process components with barrier synchronization. With SPLIT > > and SPLIT+JOIN, we can define processes that have partial > > synchronization (e.g., split all and join some sub-bag). > ... > This is a case of semantics outstripping syntax. ... Does that mean there's no OWL-S syntax that corresponds to the above semantics? In the document about OWL-S surface syntax, it says (Split+Join List-of-processes) executes all the processes in the List-of-processes in parallel, then waits until all complete before proceeding. Is that correct, or is there some thing more to it? -- Jeff
Received on Sunday, 9 May 2004 18:20:23 UTC