W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > March 2004

Re: possible mistakes in the OWL-S document?

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:37:12 -0500
Message-Id: <ED7FCBBD-80E6-11D8-8F97-0003936A0B26@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: OWL-S Mailing List <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
To: Sebastian Brandt <sbrandt@I5.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.de>

On Mar 26, 2004, at 10:32 AM, Sebastian Brandt wrote:

>
> Dear OWL-S developers,
> reading the OWL-S document, I found a few places, where a wording 
> appearently did not reflect the semantics, as I had understood them 
> from the text.
>
> 5.1.1 Process
> * Preconditions and Effects
> [...]
> The _output_ describes the actual event: that the amount of money in 
> the credit card account has been reduced.
> [...]
> In my opinion, this is just the difference between output and effect - 
> the output is some information like the invoice, yet the reduction 
> itself is the _effect_.

Yes, looks like a typo.

>
> 5.4 Composite Process
> Unordered
> [...]
> X = (Sequence a b)
> Y = (Sequence c d)
> Z = (Unordered _A_ _B_)
> [...]
> The example only makes sense, as far as I can see, if
> Z = (Unordered X Y)

Yep, nother typo.

> I hope you can find out whether I misunderstood, or your draft is 
> incorrect in this matters.

Nope. Good catches both.

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2004 13:37:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:55 GMT