Re: OWL-S preconditions - practical issues

> > [me]
> > I don't see how Donal's question follows up to Jeff's remark.
> 
> [Donal Murtagh]
> What I meant to ask was whether planners typically allow one to define
> an effect which involves a comparison operator e.g. (< ?x 5) meaning "?x
> will be less than 5 once this process has completed"?

Nope.

                                             -- Drew

Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 14:27:11 UTC