W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > June 2004

Re: OWL-S preconditions - practical issues

From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:38:23 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200406241538.i5OFcNFf025914@pantheon-po01.its.yale.edu>
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org


> > > [Donal Murtagh]

> > > However, there doesn't appear to be any consensus about how=20
> > bindings=20
> > > should be specified.
> > [Bijan Parsia]
> > There is, in broad detail. At least, we hashed it around a few times,=20
> > even on this list, I believe. There will be something. The basic=20
> > outlines are similar to PDDL. The exact syntax was still in the air=20
> > last I checked.
> [Donal]
> Any idea where I can find more details about this?
> 

We should be releasing a new draft of the technical overview with a
complete explanation any day now.  (We = I, unfortunately.)  I'll post
it on this mailing list as soon as I finish it.

-- 
                                             -- Drew McDermott
                                                Yale University CS Dept.
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 11:38:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:54:13 UTC