- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:54:23 +0100
- To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
- Cc: "David De Roure" <dder@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "public-sws-ig" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Cool, I can only agree with this relationship situation. It says: In this sense, OWL-S is complementary to both these specifications. which can be sort of viewed. Except, the complementarity has just not been ever experimented with thus far, or ? paul Le 23 déc. 04, à 15:41, Chiusano Joseph a écrit : > > This is a late reply to the original Nov 19 posting beow, as there is > new information available regarding the original question of "WSRF and > OWL-S", since the original posting. See [1], an excerpt from "OWL-S' > Relationship to Selected Other Technologies". > > [1] http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1/related.html#grid > > Kind Regards, > Joseph Chiusano > Booz Allen Hamilton > Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-sws-ig-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-sws-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David De Roure >> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 7:08 PM >> To: Paul Libbrecht >> Cc: public-sws-ig >> Subject: Re: WSRF and OWL-S ? >> >> >> Paul >> >> This is a really interesting question! >> >> I'm not going to try to answer it, just expand on I think why >> it's interesting and important... ) >> >> WSRF is based on the concepts of the Open Grid Services >> Infrastructure, designed to address the requirements of Grid >> middleware. It is anticipated to represent the convergence >> of the Web service and Grid computing communities. >> >> There is (some of us believe) a very strong case for the >> application of Semantic Web Services in Grid middleware. In >> fact this was a subject of a discussion at the IST2004 >> conference this week in the Hague. This is part of the >> Semantic Grid vision (www.semanticgrid.org) >> >> Which therefore begs a question along the lines you ask; i.e. >> how well suited are SWS technologies (OWL-S, WSMO...) to the >> description of Grid services (as in WSRF) - what we might >> call "Semantic Grid Services". >> >> Some of the deployments of SWS in grid computing have >> consisted of subsets of OWL-S applied in Web-services based >> solutions. I was conjecturing earlier this week that there >> are aspects of WSMO which, on the surface at least, suggest >> it may be well suited to some Grid computing scenarios (for >> example, separation of business logic). >> >> So, as you say, it would be really interesting to know if >> anyone is applying semantic web services to grid services >> along the lines of WSRF. >> In fact it would be interesting to know what people think the >> issues are. >> >> It should be possible to find some use cases. >> >> Thanks >> >> -- Dave >> >> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Paul Libbrecht wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I recently discovered WSRF, the Web-Service Resource Framework >>> http://www.globus.org/wsrf/ >>> and I have to say that it looks nice. >>> I was wonder wether anyone of you has been working making semantic >>> web-services stateful like this specification makes general >>> web-services stateful. >>> >>> Actually, it may be that these recommendations are >> orthogonal, but I >>> couldn't be sure of this, yet. >>> >>> paul >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2004 14:55:01 UTC