W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > December 2004

Re: WSRF and OWL-S ?

From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:54:23 +0100
Message-Id: <88DD3153-54F2-11D9-9D7F-000A95C50B1C@activemath.org>
Cc: "David De Roure" <dder@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "public-sws-ig" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>

Cool,

I can only agree with this relationship situation.
It says:
	In this sense, OWL-S is complementary to both these specifications.
which can be sort of viewed. Except, the complementarity has just not 
been ever experimented with thus far, or ?

paul
	


Le 23 déc. 04, à 15:41, Chiusano Joseph a écrit :

>
> This is a late reply to the original Nov 19 posting beow, as there is
> new information available regarding the original question of "WSRF and
> OWL-S", since the original posting. See [1], an excerpt from "OWL-S'
> Relationship to Selected Other Technologies".
>
> [1] http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1/related.html#grid
>
> Kind Regards,
> Joseph Chiusano
> Booz Allen Hamilton
> Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-sws-ig-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:public-sws-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David De Roure
>> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 7:08 PM
>> To: Paul Libbrecht
>> Cc: public-sws-ig
>> Subject: Re: WSRF and OWL-S ?
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> This is a really interesting question!
>>
>> I'm not going to try to answer it, just expand on I think why
>> it's interesting and important... )
>>
>> WSRF is based on the concepts of the Open Grid Services
>> Infrastructure, designed to address the requirements of Grid
>> middleware.  It is anticipated to represent the convergence
>> of the Web service and Grid computing communities.
>>
>> There is (some of us believe) a very strong case for the
>> application of Semantic Web Services in Grid middleware.  In
>> fact this was a subject of a discussion at the IST2004
>> conference this week in the Hague.  This is part of the
>> Semantic Grid vision (www.semanticgrid.org)
>>
>> Which therefore begs a question along the lines you ask; i.e.
>> how well suited are SWS technologies (OWL-S, WSMO...) to the
>> description of Grid services (as in WSRF) - what we might
>> call "Semantic Grid Services".
>>
>> Some of the deployments of SWS in grid computing have
>> consisted of subsets of OWL-S applied in Web-services based
>> solutions.  I was conjecturing earlier this week that there
>> are aspects of WSMO which, on the surface at least, suggest
>> it may be well suited to some Grid computing scenarios (for
>> example, separation of business logic).
>>
>> So, as you say, it would be really interesting to know if
>> anyone is applying semantic web services to grid services
>> along the lines of WSRF.
>> In fact it would be interesting to know what people think the
>> issues are.
>>
>> It should be possible to find some use cases.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -- Dave
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 	
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I recently discovered WSRF, the Web-Service Resource Framework
>>> 	http://www.globus.org/wsrf/
>>> and I have to say that it looks nice.
>>> I was wonder wether anyone of you has been working making semantic
>>> web-services stateful like this specification makes general
>>> web-services stateful.
>>>
>>> Actually, it may be that these recommendations are
>> orthogonal, but I
>>> couldn't be sure of this, yet.
>>>
>>> paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2004 14:55:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:59 GMT