W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > November 2003

Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0

From: Austin Tate <a.tate@ed.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 11:32:33 +0000
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20031109111630.01b5ced8@mail.inf.ed.ac.uk:993>
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org

At 10:24 PM 08/11/2003 -0500, Drew McDermott wrote:
>All we need is the hasPrecondition property that relates a
>step to a Condition.


I agree with this... but here may a way to do this that generalises nicely...

We have statements (about the "world" or domain) in some language that can 
be evaluated as holding true or false.  Some of these are temporarily 
invariant. But in many cases these can be temporally specified as holding 
at a time point, or between time points, or in some other temporally 
defined scope.  In my work we call this a "world state constraints" so we 
can relate it to the more general notion of constraints of many kinds 
(temporal, spatial, resource, world state, etc.) and have a simple 
extendable way to relate all constraints in a process model.

We then have specialised uses of these in things like "conditions" at time 
points (often at the begin time point of ac activity, but also on other 
temporal specifications), and effects.  I would argue that such conditions 
should be on the time specifications such as time points (normally but not 
always associated with an activity in a process model) and not on the 
activity itself.  This allows much more flexibility - as has been found by 
those working on PIF, NIST PSL and other flexible process models.

So we then have these specialised to give us convenient specialisation for 
what we want to use all the time ...

a) precondition - defined by a statement that holds at begin end of an 
activity.

b) effect - defined by a statement holds at end of an activity

Another that we will need I am sure (we already use these in our process 
models)

c) condition that holds from begin to end time points of an activity 
(preservation conditions).

Austin
Received on Sunday, 9 November 2003 06:33:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:53 GMT