W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > December 2003

Re: Cross-ontologies reasoning

From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:58:15 -0800
Message-Id: <p06001f0dbc063790ff3b@[192.168.1.11]>
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Francis McCabe wrote:
Actually, a more realistic scenario is that there are missing relations
and missing concepts  between the two ontologies.
Think about a office planner's chair ontology, compared to a
carpenter's version.

----

Is this supposed to illustrate a problem of some kind? Surely this is 
exactly what the semantic web is largely going to be FOR, to enable 
useful nuggets of formalized knowledge about some topic to be 
gathered together and used.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 12:03:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:53 GMT