W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Use case facets

Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:39:36 -0400
To: Melliyal Annamalai <melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com>
Cc: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>, public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF0B8ECFE4.00FF240E-ON85257416.007169A8-85257416.00717D3A@EliLilly.lilly.com>

Hi Melli,

I'm completely happy for you to just edit the file.

BTW, how's the process going? Will you be done by Wednesday's call?



             <melliyal.annamal                                          To 
             ai@oracle.com>            Susie M Stephens                    
             Sent by:                  <STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@lilly.com>        
             public-sweo-ig-re                                          cc 
             quest@w3.org              W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org> 
                                       Re: Use case facets                 
             03/21/2008 03:02                                              

Hi Susie,needs to be edited, and that is the file that we will editing to include
the details for each facet category (as opposed to sending them via an
email).  Does that make sense - or did you want the details on the list as
well before we edit the file?


PS: My note on the list responding to Susie's and Ivan's feedback was not
allowed to go through for some reason, I am reproducing it here -
essentially I am agreeing with Susie and Ivan that we will drop the 'level
of deployment' facet.

Susie, Ivan,

  Thanks for your comments, and I think you are both making the same
point.  I had not realized that the two categories - use cases and case
studies - reflected the level of deployment. I agree that we can drop
that facet.


Susie M Stephens wrote:

      Hi Melli,

      Will you be able to send out the details for each facet category by



       ----- Original Message -----
        From: Melliyal Annamalai [melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com]
        Sent: 03/19/2008 10:12 AM AST
        To: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
        Subject: Use case facets

      Hi all,      company.      last week.  If folks on the group are OK with these facets we will
      start working on incorporating these in the webpage.      with the following facets for the use cases. The first three are
      already facets on the page now.

      Institution's Activity Area
      Benefits of using Semantics
      Deployed or not: Choices are: Yes
      Technologies used: Choices are: RDF, OWL, SPARQL, In-house ontology,
      Public ontology       from use case #5 (Case Study: Composing a Safer Drug Regimen for each
      Patient with Semantic Web Technologies)

      Institution's Activity Area: Healthcare
      Application: Data integration, Data sharing
      Country: USA
      Benefits: Support of an evolving schema, Ability to represent
      Deployed or not: Unsure (so we would not store anything for this
      facet for this use case)
      Technologies used: RDF, OWL, In-house ontology

      Let us know what you think.

      Melli and Lee
Received on Monday, 24 March 2008 20:40:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:59 UTC