W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Use case facets

From: Susie M Stephens <STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@LILLY.COM>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:25:00 -0400
To: "Melliyal Annamalai" <melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com>, "W3C SWEO IG" <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF41381D35.3A6E7CD9-ON85257413.004F31D1@EliLilly.lilly.com>
Hi Melli,

Will you be able to send out the details for each facet category by Monday?

Cheers,

Susie


----- Original Message -----
From: Melliyal Annamalai [melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com]
Sent: 03/19/2008 10:12 AM AST
To: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Subject: Use case facets




Hi all,

  Late regrets, I got pulled into an urgent call at my company.

  Here is the note on the use case facets I should have sent last week.  
If folks on the group are OK with these facets we will start working on 
incorporating these in the webpage.

 We have come up with the following facets for the use cases. The first 
three are already facets on the page now.

Institution's Activity Area
Application
Country
Benefits of using Semantics
Deployed or not: Choices are: Yes
Technologies used: Choices are: RDF, OWL, SPARQL, In-house ontology, 
Public ontology

  Here is an example of some terms that we identified from use case #5 
(Case Study: Composing a Safer Drug Regimen for each Patient with 
Semantic Web Technologies)

Institution's Activity Area: Healthcare
Application: Data integration, Data sharing
Country: USA
Benefits: Support of an evolving schema, Ability to represent relationships
Deployed or not: Unsure (so we would not store anything for this facet 
for this use case)
Technologies used: RDF, OWL, In-house ontology

Let us know what you think.

Melli and Lee
Received on Friday, 21 March 2008 14:25:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 March 2008 14:25:49 GMT