- From: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:19:19 +0900
- To: "Peter F Brown" <peter@pensive.eu>
- Cc: "Danny Ayers" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, martin.hepp@uibk.ac.at, "Peter Ansell" <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, "Bernard Vatant" <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, "Reto Bachmann-Gmur" <reto@gmuer.ch>, "Leo Sauermann" <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>, public-sweo-ig@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
agreed that terminology is confusing and causes many troubles ;-) Per spec, an information resource that "provides some kind of compelling and unambiguous indication of the identity of a subject to humans" is a 'subject indicator', which is 'a proxy for the thing' in your term if I understand you correctly. Also per spec, "The address of a subject indicator is called a subject identifier", i.e., if an wikipedia page is a PSI (indicator), its URI is a PSId (identifier). PSI is a resource, not a URI. * btw, I've mis-understood the requirement I mentioned before: spec requires that PSI must "explicitly state the unique URI" (not explicitly state "that URI is to be used as its PSId", which I've thought). Hence, an wikipedia page could be a PSI. cheers, -- @prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name "KANZAKI Masahide", "神崎正英"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"].
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 13:19:27 UTC