The problem with /. is that it is difficult to distil real comments and questions:-( I saw the startup stuff with O'Reilly and it comes back to the usual misunderstanding of 'building from above' versus bottom-up. Things like: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/SW-FAQ#whgiantont http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/SW-FAQ#noTermAgreement I wonder what to add... (The SW-FAQ has grown quite tremendously. I wonder whether we could make it more readable. Lee, has that Javascript issue been solved that led to the mini-storm on accessibility?) Ivan Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > All, > > I just discovered that Slashdot had a recent article: > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/10/2041235 > now with the title "Semantic Web Getting Real", which is progress... > > Now, the comments on /. gives a steady stream of the usual misunderstandings, > but up-modded misunderstandings are probably shared by a relatively large > number of people, so I would think they are a good source of questions for > our FAQ? > > Kind regards > > Kjetil Kjernsmo -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:46:27 GMT