Re: Slashdot story with FAQs

The problem with /. is that it is difficult to distil real comments and 
questions:-(

I saw the startup stuff with O'Reilly and it comes back to the usual 
misunderstanding of 'building from above' versus bottom-up. Things like:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/SW-FAQ#whgiantont
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/SW-FAQ#noTermAgreement

I wonder what to add...

(The SW-FAQ has grown quite tremendously. I wonder whether we could make 
it more readable. Lee, has that Javascript issue been solved that led to 
the mini-storm on accessibility?)

Ivan

Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> All,
> 
> I just discovered that Slashdot had a recent article:
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/10/2041235
> now with the title "Semantic Web Getting Real", which is progress...
> 
> Now, the comments on /. gives a steady stream of the usual misunderstandings, 
> but up-modded misunderstandings are probably shared by a relatively large 
> number of people, so I would think they are a good source of questions for 
> our FAQ?
> 
> Kind regards 
> 
> Kjetil Kjernsmo

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf