fyi (There seems to be an OWLish slant to the survey, yet the summary says "It shows that the Semantic Web does not even need OWL and can achieve important objectives such as data-sharing and data-integration using just RDF alone."...hmm) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jorge Cardoso <jcardoso@uma.pt> Date: 16 Oct 2007 19:42 Subject: [Semantic_Web] Survey results available: "The Semantic Web Vision: Where are We?" To: Semantic Web <semantic_web@googlegroups.com> Cc: jcardoso@uma.pt Dear Semantic Web researcher, We would like to thank all the researchers from academia and industry that have participated in the survey that we did last December with the topic "The Semantic Web Vision: Where are We?". The survey involved more than 600 professionals. The most important results have been published with IEEE Intelligent Systems, Sep/Oct07, pp.22-26. The original paper with all the results is available and can be downloaded from http://dme.uma.pt/jcardoso/ Thanks again for your contribution. Regards, Jorge --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Semantic Web" group. To post to this group, send email to semantic_web@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to semantic_web-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/semantic_web?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- -- http://dannyayers.comReceived on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 10:21:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:40 GMT