W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > November 2007

Re: need editing help on the cool URI document

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:28:16 +0100
Message-ID: <474D42C0.5030800@w3.org>
To: Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>
Cc: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>, Max Völkel <voelkel@fzi.de>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Leo & al, just a point of process, not content.

We have received (well, Susie and I:-) some comments that we did not
really follow the process when publishing this note and other groups may
not consider the result of the editing as final yet. In other words,
another round of comment on the editorial results may be necessary
anyway. What this means is that, at some point, when you feel
comfortable, we will publish a SWEO Working Draft (at the moment, we do
_not_ have an official SWEO document, only an editor's draft), and ask
for a next round of review. If the reviews all converge to zero, then we
can freeze the result as a W3C Note.

What this means is: it may be a good approach to put the remark/question
below explicitly in the document as open issue and publish the whole
draft that way, and then contact the TAG/SWD again explicitly referring
to those issues. We will have more chance to get an official review and
answer than doing it otherwise...

When the text gets to that point, then the formal publishing of the
document will have to be done with me (as staff contact, that is...)

Cheers

I.

Leo Sauermann wrote:
> 
[snip]
> For this, I would ask TAG or SWD for help:
> 
>     * example rules of thumb how to distinguish between document
>       identifiers and concept identifiers (information and
>       non-information resources). Write some wget examples that do that?
>       Leo thinks we did not cover the crucial point yet: what is the
>       definitive test to get a URI for a non-information resource?
>       Range-14 says: "If an "http" resource responds to a GET request
>       with a 303 (See Other) response, then the resource identified by
>       that URI could be any resource;" Or is this such a problem at all?
>       At the end the RDF:Type says what is what.
>       I would put that into the 4.6. implementation section.
> 
> 
> best
> Leo
> 
> -- 
> ____________________________________________________
> DI Leo Sauermann       http://www.dfki.de/~sauermann 
> 
> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer 
> Kuenstliche Intelligenz DFKI GmbH
> Trippstadter Strasse 122
> P.O. Box 2080           Fon:   +49 631 20575-116
> D-67663 Kaiserslautern  Fax:   +49 631 20575-102
> Germany                 Mail:  leo.sauermann@dfki.de
> 
> Geschaeftsfuehrung:
> Prof.Dr.Dr.h.c.mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
> Dr. Walter Olthoff
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
> Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
> ____________________________________________________
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 10:28:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:58 UTC