W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > November 2007

Re: editing the cool uri document together

From: Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:42:37 +0100
Message-ID: <473D660D.7060201@dfki.de>
To: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Max Völkel <voelkel@fzi.de>

To start it,
I work today on changes suggested in SWDs feedback:
https://gnowsis.opendfki.de/repos/gnowsis/papers/2006_11_concepturi/feedback/ReviewCoolURIs_SWD.htm

I will work down from top-to-bottom, there are about 20-30 issues.

best
Leo

It was Leo Sauermann who said at the right time 15.11.2007 10:28 the 
following words:
>
> Hi SWEO,
>
> I reviewed the reviews we got on the URI paper from SWD and TAG and 
> Timbl,
> and collected them in the SVN we use, annotating them and colorcoding 
> them according to "will do" and "won't do".
> I also extracted the key problems and changes we need to do.
>
> There are many changes to do and it will take a considerable amount of 
> time doing them, I would guess a little less than four days of work 
> for a person.  Given the guess of one half-day we have in our charter 
> as "working on sweo", this can take many weeks for me to finish alone.
>
> Now we need to:
> * read the reviews and work on the document, incorporating fixes and 
> changes
> * somehow get an editing process running, noting which changes we did 
> and which not, status, etc. (I only know this from scientific papers, 
> but never did a w3c note)
>
> here I collected all the links to documents that have reviewed:
> https://gnowsis.opendfki.de/repos/gnowsis/papers/2006_11_concepturi/feedback/index.htm 
>
>
> I would now suggest the following process, as a humble start:
> * checkout the folder from SVN
>   https://gnowsis.opendfki.de/repos/gnowsis/papers/2006_11_concepturi/
> * read the feedback/index.htm and find a not-done review item that you 
> want to do.
> * write an e-mail to public-sweo-ig@w3.org and leo.sauermann@dfki.de 
> indicating what you would do
> * do it and once finished, mark the paragraph in the review that you 
> have realised as "DONE, Firstname Secondname on 20.11.2007"
> * make a SVN diff of the changes and send it to me (or I can give you 
> anytime an svn account for the repository)
>
> derivations from this process are also ok. The time between writing 
> the email "I'll do it" and sending the diff should be short not to 
> come into versioning trouble.
>
> remains the question how to credit helping hands - contributors?
>
> best
> Leo
>


-- 
____________________________________________________
DI Leo Sauermann       http://www.dfki.de/~sauermann 

Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer 
Kuenstliche Intelligenz DFKI GmbH
Trippstadter Strasse 122
P.O. Box 2080           Fon:   +49 631 20575-116
D-67663 Kaiserslautern  Fax:   +49 631 20575-102
Germany                 Mail:  leo.sauermann@dfki.de

Geschaeftsfuehrung:
Prof.Dr.Dr.h.c.mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Walter Olthoff
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
____________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 16 November 2007 09:43:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:58 UTC