W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > May 2007

Re: latest drafts of the SW flyer

From: Paula-Lavinia Patranjan <paula.patranjan@ifi.lmu.de>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:03:38 +0200
Message-ID: <465D3DEA.4010207@ifi.lmu.de>
To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
CC: public-sweo-ig@w3.org, paul@segala.com
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 May 2007 17:27, Paul Walsh - Segala wrote:
>> Blue is best for me - aren't you delighted I'm part of this group
>> with my contribution over the past while... my preferred colour is
>> very important! :)
> Very! :-)
> My preference is number 3, I feel there isn't enough in the simple ones 
> to associate with the semantic web.

I share the opinions on the current proposals expressed until 
now...well, Kjetil, I can't say that I like number 3 :) ... but, I also 
think that the first cover has no association with the SW. Still, the 
blue color used is perfect: It is a nice, warm color (not strong as the 
pink one and not 'strange' as the green one) and it is also the W3C logo 

Ivan's comments on the difficulty to read the text should also be taken 
into account for the next proposal.

Thus, I think it would be best to have a simple, blue cover where the 
title (Semantic Web) is not that small to look for it (as is the case 
for nr 2,3, and 4) and the subtitle (Realizing the Web of Data) follows 
the layout of nr 2,3, and 4 but without pink and green. Also, a couple 
of images a la RDF triples (i.e. a very simplified version of the 
current DNA structures used in 2,3, and 4) should be found on the left 
corner, below the subtitle. IMHO, we don't need a SW flyer that looks 
like e.g. nr 4, but a very simple and expressible one.

What do you think about the above proposal, which actually tries to 
summarize the received comments and of course my preferences?

Best regards,

Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 09:03:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:53 UTC