Re: [SWEO][Logos] RFC

Personally, I like abstract... ;-)

First:      9 (maybe combined, so that "S" and "W" are distinguishable even
in B&W)
Second: 1
Third:    7 (can RDF triangle be in somewhere in those layers?)

Regards,
M.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Benjamin Nowack" <>
To: <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Sent: 13 June 2007 16:22
Subject: [SWEO][Logos] RFC




Hi all,

During the last weeks and today's telcon, we managed to reduce the
list of Semantic Web logo proposals to 4 possible drafts [1]. Now
I'd like to ask the group for feedback: your preferred one(s),
which one(s) you think we should eliminate, whether we should
forget them all, etc. (If you think they're all crap and you
have an idea for the ultimate logo, you can still contact me,
but please do so asap.)

Please send your comments before the next telcon so that we can
then decide how to move on.

Thanks in advance,
Benjamin


[1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Logos

--
Benjamin Nowack
http://bnode.org/

Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 17:25:10 UTC