W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > July 2007

Re: tutorial documents - follow up to portal plans (lets make tutorials instead of portals, or both, ?)

From: Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:02:45 +0200
Message-ID: <46ADD365.6090107@dfki.de>
To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
CC: Danny Ayers <Danny.Ayers@talis.com>, W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
It was Danny Ayers who said at the right time 28.07.2007 15:45 the 
following words:
> [cc's snipped]
>
>   
>>> Danny, when we've agreed upon the main document categories,
>>> would you like to take the lead in creating the Wiki
>>> framework and adding your ideas for content?
>>>       
>
> I've made a start using Leo/Lee's category list, can always be tweaked
> (and I wouldn't worry about the long URIs, this is only for gathering):
>
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/RecommendedTutorials
>
> I've seeded some of the categories with things off the top of my head, e.g.
>
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/RecommendedTutorials/BeginnersTech
>   
perfect!

I wondered if we should rather make one wiki page with many entries - 
then moving one tutorial from one category to another is just a 
copy/paste operation, and we spare a few clicks.
If all together is only 10-30 links and a voting, having them on one 
page is better than many pages, you get an instant overview.

(Danny, please give feedback on that, its your baby :-)


> Couple of questions came to mind:
> Do we need a category for demonstrators & existing, deployed SemWeb apps?
>   
they should be covered in the "SWEO case studies".
> Do we need a representative doc for each individual technology (RDF,
> RDFS, OWL, SPARQL, SWRL, N3, GRDDL...)?
>   
it would be a good idea to have a section on these technologies, 
containing a link to the spec, the primer,
for some technologies, like RDF+RDFS, a tutorial is better when it 
covers some practical aspect, for example "using RDFS and FOAF to 
connect with your friends" or "using RDFS within the Jena framework"

but that goes too far, these resources should be in the 
SWEO-Infogathering sparql endpoint and browsable in some visualization, 
where I can select "jena + rdfs" and get something. I would not do that 
in a wiki, too cumbersome.

once the skeleton looks good, we should make a call on SWIG/planetrdf to 
fill it.

> Cheers,
> Danny.
>
>   


-- 
____________________________________________________
DI Leo Sauermann       http://www.dfki.de/~sauermann 

Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer 
Kuenstliche Intelligenz DFKI GmbH
Trippstadter Strasse 122
P.O. Box 2080           Fon:   +49 631 20575-116
D-67663 Kaiserslautern  Fax:   +49 631 20575-102
Germany                 Mail:  leo.sauermann@dfki.de

Geschaeftsfuehrung:
Prof.Dr.Dr.h.c.mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Walter Olthoff
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
____________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 12:02:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:39 GMT