W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Reminder: Feedback for the flyer

From: Paula-Lavinia Patranjan <paula.patranjan@ifi.lmu.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:55:07 +0200
Message-ID: <4694D32B.5070408@ifi.lmu.de>
To: Dunja Ewinger <de@webxcerpt.com>
Cc: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>

Hi Dunja,

a bit late, I know...I apologize for the delay in sending you the answers.

Paula

>
>
> *1. **Type of flyer (technical, non-technical, a mixture)*
>
> What do we want? Jeffrey has been so kind to list the options. Please 
> vote with -1 (negative), 0 (neutral), or +1 (positive).
>
> a. It might be worth while to product two flyers, one for the 
> technical side, one for the non-technical side. Each of the two flyers 
> should be visually similar to the other. They could have similar 
> layout, but from a distance be different, say, by background color. 
> Only upon reading them would you see that one would have the 
> specialist content, the other would address the average person.
>
-1

> b. Maybe the 1st page or 2 could be the 'executive summary', followed 
> by gory, geeky details.
>
+1
> c. As you see with multiple languages sometimes -- have it printed on 
> 2 sides. One side is the overview, the other (which is sometimes 
> printed upside down to distinguish it) be the technical info.
>
-1
> *2. Title page*
>
> Which draft do you prefer?
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/group/wiki/first_drafts
>
> Please note: The grid will be removed or modified and the slogan "Data 
> unleashed" will be included by the designer.
>
The first one.

> *3. Page 2
>
> *We have 2 options for the second page: either a "hot story" or a 
> general statement. Please vote with -1 (negative), 0 (neutral), or +1 
> (positive).
> .
>
> a. "hot story" - please see Lee's version (which is also the latest) 
> here: 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/group/wiki/Semantic_Web_Flyer/Hotstories
>
> The idea here is to "catch" people by giving them a good story that 
> shows that the Semantic Web can solve problems and makes life easier. 
> The story needed to be on a general (every-day-life) level to address 
> everyone.
>
-1

> b. a simple statement underneath the title question "What is the 
> Semantic Web" similar to the definitions on the W3C activity page 
> (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/) <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/:>
>
> Ann and Leo gave some good input on that. We are currently working on 
> a suitable text based on these ideas.
>
+1

> *4. Page 3*
>
> Title: Web of data.
> Currently we have 3 diagrams on Data Integration. All of them would 
> need to be improved by the designer:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/group/wiki/Semantic_Web_Flyer/images_dataintegration 
>
>
> Which one is the most suitable, so to say the one that expresses most 
> the "Web of Data"- aspect? Please vote with -1 (negative), 0 
> (neutral), or +1 (positive).
1st: +1
2nd: 0
3rd: +1

>
> We have 2 kinds of additional information to the image. Which one do 
> you like more? Please vote with -1 (negative), 0 (neutral), or +1 
> (positive)
>
> a. A Web of connected knowledge bases.
> Contextualize the use of data by using ontologies.
> Retrieval of information through a unified query interface,
> ... regardless how and where data is stored.
> Reasoning with data and offering different views over the data.
>
+1

> b. An extension of the current web
> …it is based on XML,
> and standardizes how you can publish and access information.
> Your existing data sources, web content management, intranet systems 
> or database systems, can be connected based on web technology and RDF.
> This reduces integration costs and simplifies the IT landscape, like 
> the RSS success story has already shown.
>
> Additionally to the image we have the testimonials and other 
> application fields.
>
0 (needs to be adapted)

> *5. Page 4
>
> *Do you think it would be good to put in the Semantic Web layer cake 
> including the definitions?
> Please vote with -1 (negative), 0 (neutral), or +1 (positive).
>
>
+1 for the layer cake

> *AOB*
>
> **Do you have anything to add (comments, use case…)?
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 12:58:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:39 GMT