W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Microformats vs RDFa

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:47:35 +0100
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd0701260447m1673eac2lad9462e2b39c85bc@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "Paul Walsh, Segala" <paulwalsh@segala.com>, "Susie Stephens" <susie.stephens@oracle.com>, "Kjetil Kjernsmo" <kjetilk@opera.com>, public-sweo-ig@w3.org
On 26/01/07, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Danny Ayers wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26/01/07, *Paul Walsh, Segala* <paulwalsh@segala.com
> > <mailto:paulwalsh@segala.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >     [PW] couldn't have put it better myself. You'll see from Sam's blog
> >     that it's plastered with Microformats. Why doesn't everyone on this
> >     list vote RDFa <g>
> >
> > Heh, I already did. Though truth be told I'm rather on the fence when it
> > comes to RDFa because of the current ties to XHTML 2.0 (and QNames in
> > attributes are ugly).
>
> Danny,
>
> this is no longer true.


Thanks Ivan. I knew that changes were planned, didn't realise they'd already
taken place.

-- 

http://dannyayers.com
Received on Friday, 26 January 2007 12:47:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:35 GMT