W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Hacker rally questionnaire draft, take 2

From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:11:20 +0100
To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
Cc: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <PM-GA.20070116131120.8C25F.3.1D@192.168.27.2>


Hi, here are some comments re wording (no essential ones, really, I 
think the questions are fine).

On 10.01.2007 18:00:50, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
>The W3C Semantic Web Education and Outreach Interest Group wishes to 
>encourage developers to come together a few practical projects, and 
*for* a few practical projects?

>hopes to gather a community of developers to write code that solves a 
>current problem. This rally seeks real running code, not vapourware, 
s/gather/gather and support/ perhaps? Not sure what SWEO's planned
contribution to motivation is..

>and it seeks to reach a wide user base. We want to encourage people to 
>create something that makes a real difference to people now, and 
>through that, promote the Semantic Web.
maybe "promote *a* Semantic Web" (as suggested on the wiki somewhere),
or "a more semantic Web", or "the benefits of a|the s|Semantic Web".
Just ideas with the basic thought of being as open (tech-wise) as 
possible (working around bad rap hooks).

>So, if you were to decide the project that you think would promote the 
>Semantic Web the most by getting it into people's lives, what would it 
>be?
hmm, what exactly is the decision about in the end? Will SWEO just 
suggest a "winner", or what will be the next steps? Is it a two-phase
process where people 1st make suggestions and can then vote on the
project they'd like to see happen / contribute to? Maybe we should 
add another sentence here?

>2. Rationale:
>3. Why do you think this project will have a wide impact? 
merge those, perhaps?

>10. What other technologies could be used to achieve most of the goals 
>of the project, and why are Semantic Web technologies better suited?
Maybe switch the order of these sentence parts or make it sound a bit
less "versus"-ish? "What would be the main benefit of using Semantic Web
technologies to achieve ..." or so. We could also try to combine q4
with this one,  la "What do SemWeb techs add and where do you see
an overlap with other technologies that could be used to accelerate
the adoption of your solution?"


I hope some of those comments make sense ;)
Benjamin



>Best,
>
>Kjetil
>-- 
>Kjetil Kjernsmo
>Semantic Web Specialist
>Opera Software ASA
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2007 12:12:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:35 GMT