W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > February 2007

RE: SWEO is in the news :-)

From: Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:29:57 -0000
To: "'Kjetil Kjernsmo'" <kjetilk@opera.com>, <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20070207153001.C44F911F878D2@postie1.hosting365.ie>

Doh. Ok so mass adoption hasn't happened. Not because I didn't know about
it, but because some of my colleagues didn't know about it either. Why do
you think that is?

Is there a use case to create a Content Label for it still in your opinion?
Remember, that Content Labels are likely to replace PICS if we manage to get
the Charter signed off. Furthermore, Content Labels could be sold as a new
implementation that will work better... productisation.

Cheers
Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Kjetil Kjernsmo
Sent: 07 February 2007 15:26
To: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: SWEO is in the news :-)


On Wednesday 07 February 2007 16:14, Paul Walsh, Segala wrote:
> Reading the article, we could publish a vocabulary for creative
> commons.

That's existed for many years allready: 
http://creativecommons.org/technology/metadata/

It is also in quite widespread use, it would be really nice to have some 
useful applications around it.

Kjetil
-- 
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Semantic Web Specialist
Opera Software ASA


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.29/673 - Release Date: 06/02/2007
17:52
 
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:30:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:35 GMT