Re: [Information Gathering] next steps: syndication, good weblocation

Leo,
>
> Lee, Kingsley,
>
> A good discussion, it brought out what we really want.
>
> It was Kingsley Idehen who said at the right time 02.04.2007 15:49 the 
> following words:
>>
>> Lee et al,
>>
>> How far away is <http://projects.semwebcentral.org/> from what you 
>> are seeking? 
>
> Far. Its not inviting for outsiders. It is a beginning, but its not 
> welcoming.
Leo,

I am referring to this portal as a "Concept" I tried to emphasize we 
don't respond to the content.
> This is more what we need as a start page:
> http://projects.semwebcentral.org/?page_id=7
The point I am making by referring to this portal. Basically, is this 
the kind of portal we seek (there are other aspects of what I think we 
need in this portal).

>
> then delve into projects, conferences, etc.
>
>
>> 1/ SWEO editor/editors/task force begins classification of prominent 
>> resources
>> 2/ SWEO/community developer(s)/task force builds survey that lets 
>> resource publishers (more general than "tool developers" in my mind) 
>> classify their matierals
>> 3/ SWEO editors keep an eye on classifications and refine anything 
>> that seems amiss
>
>
> It was Lee Feigenbaum who said at the right time 01.04.2007 00:17 the 
> following words:
>> We can't do it if people don't want to do it as part of SWEO's work. 
>> Kingsley, this isn't a technical argument I've been making (it never 
>> has been!). It's an argument as to the work SWEO should undertake to 
>> successfully use the data to accomplish education and outreach goals. 
>> Leo wrote:
>>
>> """
>> And we can then encourage independent 3rd parties to aggregate the 
>> data and provide the interface
>>
>> I asked Susie for her thoughts about this and she proposes exactly 
>> this, stick to information gathering.
>>
>> Making a web interface that is user-friendly (especially newbie 
>> friendly) and is managed by W3C is tricky, because W3C is a 
>> technology standardization body and not an education body.
>> """
>>
>> ...which is what I've been disagreeing about all along. Your messages 
>> have focused on technology details, which to me seem completely 
>> orthogonal to the messages I've been sending.
>>
Lee: I have not being making a technical argument. And I hope that by 
exposing this portal I have at least illuminated my point :-) This 
portal is at the end of the day a layer above the RDF Data Source from 
the Information Gathering effort (for lack of a better description: It 
is an RDF application bound to the RDF Data we've gathered).


Kingsley
>>
>> Lee
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>
>


-- 


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com

Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 14:35:28 UTC