W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Semantic Web Layer Cake Update Suggestion

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:26:46 -0500
Message-ID: <456F2266.50608@openlinksw.com>
To: jeff.pollock@oracle.com
CC: "'Wilson, MD \(Michael\)'" <m.d.wilson@rl.ac.uk>, 'W3C SWEO IG' <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>

Jeff Pollock wrote:
> Hmmm... not the way I read it.  As the UI and App layer extends left of the
> trust, proof, and logic layers, I see invisible lines to each, thusly
> implying that UI and Apps can be built directly to either: trust, proof,
> unifying logic, or sparql directly.
>
>   
Jeff,

Yes, the point I was trying to make in my response.

BTW - I accidentally replied to you instead of Wilson :-)

Kingsley
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Wilson, MD (Michael)
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 9:46 AM
> To: jeff.pollock@oracle.com; Kingsley Idehen; W3C SWEO IG
> Subject: RE: Semantic Web Layer Cake Update Suggestion
>
>
> Jeff
>
> The main problem with that diagram is the User Interface & Applications
> layer at the top which suggests that applications can only be built on
> top of the Trust layer, and not on top of each layer. 
>
>
> Michael Wilson
> Manager, UK & Ireland Office of W3C
> e-Science Centre
> CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
> Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK
> http://www.w3c.rl.ac.uk/ukofficecontact.html
> Fax: +44 1235 445831
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this message is confidential and intended
> only for the individual named above. If you are not the intended
> recipient, or responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying,
> or disclosure of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Pollock
> Sent: 30 November 2006 17:30
> To: 'Kingsley Idehen'; 'W3C SWEO IG'
> Subject: RE: Semantic Web Layer Cake Update Suggestion
>
>
> Kingsley-
>
> The diagram Ivan sent here:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/layerCake-4.png
>
> Implies to me that RDF needn't use XML.  Although I don't personally
> feel that the XML serialization of RDF is such a big market issue, real
> or perceived, the picture there seems to address the concern quite
> nicely.
>
> Warm Regards,
>
> -Jeff-
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Kingsley Idehen
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 9:18 AM
> To: 'W3C SWEO IG'
> Subject: Semantic Web Layer Cake Update Suggestion
>
>
> All,
>
> My initial attempt at a revised Cake is at: 
> http://myopenlink.net:8890/DAV/home/kidehen/gallery/my_photos/Semantic_W
> eb_S
> tack_Rev1.png
>
> The focus right now is fixing the XML placement issues such that RDF the
> Data Model and its optional XML serialization format are distinct.
>
> I have also added a Data Provider / Data Source layer since the URI/IRIs
> are "Resource Identifiers" for  Data which has to come from somewhere
> :-)
>
>   
Received on Thursday, 30 November 2006 18:27:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:34 GMT