- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:52:23 -0500
- To: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
Hi SWEOids, Wing and I had an interesting and somewhat enlightening conversation with another IBMer today. Our colleague was somewhat familiar with the SW world and is very familiar with the XML world, and he expressed concerns that SW technologies (and RDF / SPARQL in particular) may fall short in one prominent area in which XML / XQuery shines: dealing with content-oriented (often mixed content) documents. He was concerned about this given some of our claims about the value of RDF/SW technologies as a unifying environment for data and metadata. He gave various examples ranging from insurance policies to resumes to rentral agreements, with the basic idea being that XQuery can easily answer questions that involve searching within a document (or, more-so, searching for text in a particular paragraph of a document, perhaps with emphasis added) which uses XML markup. He wondered aloud and we discussed what the SW approach to this would be, and we agreed that it's lacking right now. He expressed worry that whereas XML can wrap data that might be best expressed as relational or RDF data (and then join that data in XQuery queries with document data), the RDF world may not have as nice a story. I (personally) need to think the issues here through a bit more, but to me it was not an objection that I've heard commonly, but it was an interesting one to which I had no immediate response, so I wanted to throw it out here and solicit thoughts and/or feedback. (I don't think it's imperative that we have an immediate or bulletproof response to every potential SW objection, but thinking about where the technologies fall short in addition to where they excel should help us craft our messaging.) have a good weekend everyone, Lee
Received on Friday, 8 December 2006 20:52:48 UTC