W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > December 2006

Re: [InfoGathering] Can DOAP cover?

From: Alexandre Passant <alex@passant.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:18:33 +0100
Message-ID: <f0e160660612060818y6b0f8916k624033922b92dc0@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Uldis Bojars" <uldis.bojars@deri.org>
Cc: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "W3C SWEO IG" <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>, "Edd Dumbill" <edd@usefulinc.com>

Hi all,

On 12/6/06, Uldis Bojars <uldis.bojars@deri.org> wrote:
>
>
> One way to do that would be to categorise or assign topics to projects and
> to select only those from the "Semantic Web" category. You can also find
> some Semantic Web projects on doapstore.org by looking for projects that use
> RDF [1]or OWL. While strictly speaking RDF is not a programming language
> some projects do use it in their DOAP descriptions.

I think another way to find and restrict the tool (and more generally
DOAP descriptions) to SW projects (and to any kind of project
actually) is to use the doap:category property for each projects, as
some people do with their foaf profiles using foaf:interest, that can
then conduct to find people with similar interests (as I've done in
foafmap [1], eg [2]).
Then, you would be able to browse only SW-project.

I already saw some projects using this [4], yet I can't see if
doap:category range is designed to be a literal or a URI/Resource,
which would be better I think (even if we must agree on some URL for
topics, a problem that already exists in foaf, see [2] vs [3])

Best,

Alex.

[1] http:/foafmap.net
[2] http://foafmap.net/tag/52
[3] http://foafmap.net/tag/1
[4] http://doapstore.org/view.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fjackrabbit.apache.org%2F
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 16:18:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:35 GMT