- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:20:29 +0200
- To: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:00:57PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> Could we officially close ISSUE-224 [1]? Have we received news from i18n >> meeting? >> >> That's now the last open issue on our list [2]---I closed 225 and 226, >> considering the answer (and lack of answer) we got for them. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/224 >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/products/3 > > Hi Antoine, > > On 13 August, Felix responded to Slistair's post as follows [1]: > > that resolves my concerns, thank you very much. Due to summer holidays I > would propose that you regard this as accepted by the i18n core working > group if you don't hear from others within 24 hours. > > Addison agreed [2], though there does not seem to have been further > discussion on the public-i18n-core list after [3]. > > Citing these is in my opinion enough for closing the issue. > > Tom > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Aug/0024.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Aug/0026.html > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2009JulSep/0037.html Hi Tom, No one objected to your arguments, which make much sense to me. I thus closed our last issue! Cheers, Antoine
Received on Sunday, 20 September 2009 10:21:10 UTC