- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:38:33 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org,public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
ISSUE-237: Better rdf:List support in RDFa 1.1 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/237 Raised by: Ben Adida On product: RDFa by Toby Inkster: """ The following language in a future spec would make marking up lists in RDFa much easier: === RDFa 1.1 processors MUST handle the property rdfs:member specially. If the subject of a triple with predicate rdfs:member is known to be an rdf:List, then the processor MUST add appropriate rdf:first, rdf:rest, and rdf:nil triples to assemble the list. If the subject of a triple with predicate rdfs:member is known to be a rdf:Bag, rdf:Alt or rdf:Seq, then the processor MUST add appropriate rdf:_1, rdf:_2, etc triples. "Known to be" = RDFa processors MUST recognise the explicit container types rdf:List, rdf:Bag, rdf:Alt and rdf:Seq. RDFa processors MAY implement RDFS, OWL or other reasoning to determine that other resources may be containers. === """ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Sep/0070.html
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 05:38:42 UTC