- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 23:19:24 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org,public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
ISSUE-227: undeclared prefix in @datatype http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/227 Raised by: Everyone On product: RDFa Richard Cyganiak: """ Now I wonder what a conformant RDFa parser should do when confronted with an undeclared namespace in @datatype? Ignore the triple? Ignore the @datatype? Assume the empty string as prefix URI? Halt and catch fire? """ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Aug/0136.html potential resolution: """ Yes, thank you. However, if that value ends up being a non-CURIE, the rules I cited apply and it should be treated as "", which then means it is a literal (not an XMLLiteral). """ by Shane in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Aug/0146.html
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 23:22:18 UTC