W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > March 2009

Re: [SKOS] SKOS ontology sanity-check?

From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:10:32 +0000
Message-Id: <B02587EB-50CC-4E2B-9961-A4C354B98EEB@manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
To: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>

On 19 Mar 2009, at 11:56, Thomas Baker wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:00:53PM +0100, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>>>> Note I have *not* modified the DL version of the SKOS schema at  
>>>> [5].
>>>
>>> I'm not clear on the intended status of the DL schema. Where is
>>> it linked from, if at all?
>>
>> That's unclear to me as well. I think I discovered it by using the  
>> Protégé
>> SKOS plug-in, which was using it at a time...
>
> Okay - I will continue to assume this is not intended to be part
> of the Recommendation package...

This was something that I'd produced while working on the schemas,  
partly in order to support something that Simon Jupp was doing in  
SKOSEd, and partly as an experiment to see if it was feasible to do  
the generation of the DL schema from the original -- it's done  
through an XSL translation, making use of the "SN" comments to  
determine which pieces to drop. Bit grubby, but it works :-).

I would not consider it part of the Recommendation package.

	Sean

--
Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 09:11:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 March 2009 09:11:08 GMT