- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:26:52 -0400
- To: "Sini, Margherita (KCEW)" <Margherita.Sini@fao.org>
- Cc: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi Margherita: On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Sini, Margherita (KCEW) <Margherita.Sini@fao.org> wrote: > Indeed if you try this: http://www.fao.org/aims/aos/agrovoc/c_34338 > is ok. Since you are already resolving URIs like this you might want to consider using them in your RDF output in place of the current hash URIs. The only adjustments you would need to make would be to: - do a 303 instead of the 302 redirect you are currently doing - do content negotiation to redirect to a application/rdf+xml representation if the client has a preference for it I imagine you could give your software developers the Cool URIs document [1] and reasonably ask them to implement the pattern described in 4.3? It ought not to be too bad since you already have URIs for the application/rdf+xml [2]. You can also use Diego's linked data validator Vapor [3] to make sure things are working right. I only mention this because I think being able to follow your nose to broader, narrower and related concepts gets to the heart of what SKOS has to offer ... and the time is right :-) [4]. //Ed [1] http://www.fao.org/aims/aos/agrovoc%23c_34338 [2] http://vivaldi.cpe.ku.ac.th:443/ACSWWebservice/services/service/getConceptInfo?ontologyName=Food&className=c_34338&format=skos [3] http://validator.linkeddata.org/vapour [4] http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_berners_lee_on_the_next_web.html
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 10:27:28 UTC