Re: draft PR request

Ralph,

Thanks, I will update the request and send it out.

Wrt Diego's comment about the mailing list, I'm quite sure that is a 
cut-andpaste error. I will correct it.

Guus


Ralph R. Swick wrote:
> At 03:13 PM 6/1/2009 +0200, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Here is the draft PR request for SKOS.
> 
> Looks good, Guus.  A few comments.
> 
> Needs to cite (e.g. by reference) the Abstract and Status of this Document
> sections.  Proposed SOTD:
> 
>    This document is a W3C Proposed Recommendation published by the
>    Semantic Web Deployment Working Group, part of the W3C Semantic Web
>    Activity.  This document reflects editorial changes arising during
>    the Candidate Recommendation review, summarized in the Changes
>    section.  An implementation report documents known uses of SKOS
>    during the Candidate Recommendation review period.  An updated
>    SKOS Primer Working Draft is being published concurrently with this
>    Proposed Recommendation.
> 
>    Comments on this document may be addressed to
>    public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org. Please include the text "SKOS
>    comment" in the subject line. All comments sent to that address
>    are available in a public archive.
> 
> 
>> Guus
>>
>>
>>
>> Director,
>>
>> The Semantic Web Deployment Working Group requests transition to Proposed Recommendation for
>>
>>    SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference
>>    [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-skos-reference-20090317/
>>
>> The updated editor's draft can be found at:
>>
>>    [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/  (Revision 1.13)
>>
>> The record of the WG decision to requests this transition is at:
>>
>>    [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-minutes.html#item03
>>
>> No substantive issues were raised during CR, though a few comments
>> resulted in editorial clarifications to the specification. Changes from the
>> Candidate Recommendation version are given in the "Changes" 
>> section of editors draft:
>>
>>    [4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/#changes
> 
> It would be good to cite the messages (or logged issues) that led
> to these changes (e.g. issues 192, 218, and 219).  Strictly speaking
> we could be asked for another Disposition of Comments report but
> given the nature of these comments and the fact that the changes
> are noted in the Changes section if we cite the messages and
> issues in our transition request that ought to suffice.  The mention
> of the issues serves as a response to the "Evidence that the document
> has received wide review" portion of the transition request.
> 
> 
>> There were no features at risk.
>>
>> The requirements have not changed since Candidate Recommendation.
>>
>> This specification has no normative references to W3C specifications
>> that are not yet Proposed Recommendations.
>>
>> The Groups' implementation report [5] notes 27 implementations with
>> a broad coverage of SKOS features.  All comments have received formal
>> responses; these are recorded in the issue tracker [6]. The specification
>> has therefore met the CR exit criteria.
>>
>>    [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/implementation.html
>>    [6] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues
>>
>> There have been no formal objections.
>>
>> There have been no changes to the patent disclosure pages since the
>> transition to Candidate Recommendation. There are no open exclusion
>> opportunities.
> 
> For the benefit of others reading our request, it would be good to
> note that the Working Group intends to publish an updated
> SKOS Primer Working Draft at the same time as this Proposed
> Recommendation.  (In case they don't read the proposed SOTD above :)
> 
>> Thomas Baker
>> Guus Schreiber
>> co-chairs Semantic Web Deployment WG
> 
>