On 29/1/09 22:21, Guus Schreiber wrote: > As an afterthought: > > Perhaps we should include a fourth point about the fact that RDF/XML is > not any more the only normative exchange syntax. This may very well > hamper interoperability between the SKOS/RDF and OWL2 world. On this point, I tried briefly to understand how the rdf:text proposal would look in RDFa ... ... I don't think it'd be pretty (unless @content is used extensively). Literals would contain extra materials not intended for human consumption. Not 100% sure on that, but if I understand rdf:text right, ... DanReceived on Thursday, 29 January 2009 21:26:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 January 2009 21:26:11 GMT