W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > February 2009

[SKOS] Minor SKOS Primer update

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:50:19 +0100
Message-ID: <49A4254B.6020205@few.vu.nl>
To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, phayes@ihmc.us
Hi everyone (cc Pat)

About today's action:
ACTION: Antoine provide a pointer to the new Primer Editor's Draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-swd-minutes.html#action05]

Following Pat's personal mail (copied below) about the answer I proposed to his comment [1], I have updated a sentence to the Primer. The new version is at [2]

Best,

Antoine

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2009Feb/0068.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/primer/primer-20090224.html

-------- Message d'origine--------
De: Pat Hayes [mailto:phayes@ihmc.us]
Date: mar. 24/02/2009 15:24
: Antoine Isaac
Objet : Re: [SKOS] RE : misleading sentence in the SKOS primer


On Feb 24, 2009, at 1:38 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:

>
> Dear Pat,
>
> Thank you for taking the time to report on this. That's much 
> appreciated! Indeed we certainly want to avoid any misleading.
>
> I propose to rewrite the sentence as:
> [
> In particular, there is no logical dependency between skos:inScheme
> and owl:imports: the use of owl:imports will not result in the
> presence of any skos:inScheme statements other than the ones already 
> asserted in the imported graph."
> ]
>
> Do you think that would be better?
>

Yes, perfect. Thanks. As I say, your example does make the point clear 
once one has read that far :-)

Pat
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:50:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:50:56 GMT