- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:25:11 -0400
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
The minutes of today's Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
telecon are now ready. Thanks to Antoine for scribing.
http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html
A text snapshot follows.
----
SWD WG
11 Aug 2009
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Aug/0005.html
See also: [3]IRC log, previous [4]2009-07-07
[3] http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-irc
[4] http://www.w3.org/2009/07/07-swd-minutes.html
Attendees
Present
Ralph Swick, Tom Baker, Diego Berrueta, Guus Schreiber,
Antoine Isaac, Sean Bechofer, Ed Summers
Regrets
Alistair Miles
Chair
Guus
Scribe
Antoine
Contents
* Topics
1. Admin
2. SKOS
3. AOB
* Summary of Action Items
_____________________________________________________
Admin
RESOLUTION: accept the [10]minutes of last telecon
[10] http://www.w3.org/2009/07/07-swd-minutes.html
SKOS
Guus: what's the status on the language label issues?
Antoine: none of the solutions we proposed was judged acceptable by
the I18N Group, per Felix Sasaki
... so long as the examples continued to use private language
subtags
... the I18N Group is very reluctant to permit private language
subtags
<Guus>
[11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Aug/0001.h
tml
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Aug/0001.html
<Guus> proposed resolution
Antoine: the last resolution [from 7 July] we proposed to was to
modify the examples to be syntactically correct
... to modify the examples and add a warning that that use may not
correspond to BCP
... but the I18N folk did not accept that proposal
Guus: I'm happy with that
Sean: I'm happy to go with Alistair's suggestion
Tom: I also agree
<Ralph> [12]discussion of symbolic labels
[12] http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#symbollabels
Ralph: I'm ok with dropping it
... maybe we should hear from Margherita first
... There was a desire to use an appropriate mechanism for this
... if we remove the section from the spec we might frustrate these
people who were counting on using this.
Guus: I see five vocabularies that use notations
... in the implementation report
Ralph: the mail from Margherita in January last year
<Ralph> [13]Margherita's comments on symbolic labels (see 'section
4.4')
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html
<Ralph> does AGROVOC use this private language mechanism?
Ed: I remember this was before we had SKOS-XL on the table
... SKOS-XL might alleviate some of the problems
Ralph: +1
<Ralph> delete from "Usually a notation system does not have ..."
through the end of Example 22.
<TomB>
[14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0026.h
tml - "move in your current time schedule to Recommendation"
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0026.html
<Ralph> [15]original comment from I18N Core
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jun/0040.html
Guus: PROPOSED to resolve ISSUE-224 by deleting the final paragraph
of section 6.5.4 (from "Usually a notation system does not have...")
and example 22
<Ralph> +1
<edsu> +1
RESOLVED to resolve ISSUE-224 by deleting the final paragraph of
section 6.5.4 (from "Usually a notation system does not have...")
and example 22
ACTION: Alistair to respond to Felix and implement the changes
resulting from our resolution to ISSUE-224 [recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action01]
Guus: consider timing w.r.t. Recommendation
... I saw some reference to 18 August
Ralph: we ought to have a formal acceptance from I18N Core WG that
they accept our resolution
Guus: there's a practical question as the Primer needs small updates
too
Ed and Antoine: ok for 18 august
ACTION: Ed and Antoine to provide before 17 august a pointer to the
latest version [recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action02]
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0022.h
tml
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0022.html
Is a list of editorial changes to respond editorial comments from
Daniel Barclay
<Ralph>
[19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0001.h
tml
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0001.html
There's consensus on the mail from Elliott Rusty Harold
scribe: to keep to the singular of "note"
ACTION: Antoine to send an answer to Elliott's mail [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action03]
There was another mail from Daniel Barclay
<Ralph> [21]ISSUE-226
[21] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/226
ACTION: Antoine to respond to Daniel Barclay's mail by the mail in
[22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0022.h
tml [recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action04]
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0022.html
<Ralph> [24]SKOS Use Cases and Requirements
[24] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-ucr/
<TomB>
[25]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Apr/0109.h
tml
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Apr/0109.html
<TomB>
[26]http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html
[26] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html
<Ralph> [27]28 April SKOS UCR Editor's Draft
[27] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html
ACTION: 2009-05-19: SWD WG to identify final version of Use Cases.
[DONE]
<scribe> -- DONE :
[28]http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html
[28] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html
ACTION: Ralph to publish the UC document as a group note at the time
of recommendation [recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action05]
Tom: should we publish the implementation report?
Guus: it's not part of our delivrables
Sean: shall I remove the request for comments?
Guus: yes
ACTION: Sean to update the implementation report [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action06]
<Ralph> specifically, the updates are to put a date of publication
Tom: what happened with the re-map from the mapping spec?
<Ralph> [31]redirections
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Aug/0011.html
Tom: it is currently done
ACTION: Ralph publish Antoine's new intermediate pages for legacy
specs [recorded in
[32]http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action11] [DONE]
[32] http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action11
AOB
Guus: proposal: final proposal on august 25
... mainly to discuss SKOS community aspects
<TomB> +1 to meet on 25 August
Guus: so this should be our last telecon
ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition to Group
Note [recorded in
[33]http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02]
[CONTINUES]
[33] http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02
if no progress till next time, it will be dropped
<TomB> [34]http://www.w3.org/2009/07/07-swd-minutes.html#item03
[34] http://www.w3.org/2009/07/07-swd-minutes.html#item03
ACTION: Ralph to publish [35]http://berrueta.net/recipes-20090407/
as a WG Note [recorded in
[36]http://www.w3.org/2009/06/02-swd-minutes.html#action07]
[CONTINUES]
[35] http://berrueta.net/recipes-20090407/
[36] http://www.w3.org/2009/06/02-swd-minutes.html#action07
Guus: meeting adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Alistair to respond to Felix and implement the changes
resulting from our resolution to ISSUE-224 [recorded in
[37]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Antoine to respond to Daniel Barclay's mail by the
mail in
[38]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0022.h
tml [recorded in
[39]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: Antoine to send an answer to Elliott's mail [recorded
in [40]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: Ed and Antoine to provide before 17 august a pointer
to the latest version [recorded in
[41]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: Ralph to publish the UC document as a group note at
the time of recommendation [recorded in
[42]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action05]
[NEW] ACTION: Sean to update the implementation report [recorded in
[43]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-swd-minutes.html#action06]
[38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jul/0022.html
[PENDING] ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition
to Group Note [recorded in
[44]http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02]
[PENDING] ACTION: Ralph to publish
[45]http://berrueta.net/recipes-20090407/ as a WG Note recorded in
[46]http://www.w3.org/2009/06/02-swd-minutes.html#action07]
[44] http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02
[45] http://berrueta.net/recipes-20090407/
[46] http://www.w3.org/2009/06/02-swd-minutes.html#action07
[DONE] ACTION: Ralph publish Antoine's new intermediate pages for
legacy specs [recorded in
[47]http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action11]
[47] http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action11
[End of minutes]
_____________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [48]scribe.perl version 1.135
([49]CVS log)
$Date: 2009/08/11 17:23:44 $
[48] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[49] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 17:25:56 UTC