Antoine Isaac wrote: > Dear Daniel, > > Hopefully you will find an answer to our question in the last "Note on > supposed "transitiveness inheritance"" in the section of the SKOS Primer > on transitive hierarchies [1]. Yes. Thanks. > This topic was indeed raised quite many times, since that's a point of > RDFS sub-property link semantics which is far from trivial... Yeah, I figured that subproperty relationships were tricker than familar subclass relationships. Daniel -- (Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 15:51:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 April 2009 15:51:20 GMT