W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: ISSUE-134: Last Call Comment: owl:inverseOf

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:36:26 +0200
To: public-swd-wg@w3.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uiak60m2smjzpq@acer3010.lan>

Anyone know why these are being sent to the RDFa list as well?

Steven

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:34:25 +0200, SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>  
wrote:

> ISSUE-134: Last Call Comment: owl:inverseOf
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/134
>
> Raised by: Alistair Miles
> On product: SKOS
>
> Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]:
>
> """
> Don't say "is /the/ owl:inverseOf ...". In OWL Full, a property p may  
> have two
> inverses q1 and q2 with q1 owl:differentFrom q2. For q1 and q2, in order  
> to be
> both inverse of p, it suffices that q1 owl:equivalentProperty q2 holds,  
> i.e.
> that q1 and q2 only have the same property extension, they don't have to  
> be the
> same resource. Better say "is owl:inverseOf". Same for S25, S26, S43.  
> Please
> check yourself whether I have missed some occurrence.
> """
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 11:37:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:54 UTC