- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:07:20 +0200
- To: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Sounds ok! Maybe adding a pointer to the example itself in the document would be nice... Antoine > Here is a draft response to Michael on ISSUE-133, comments welcome. > > --- begin draft message --- > > Dear Michael, > > Thank you for your detailed and helpful comments. In response to your > comment below: > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:33:12AM +0000, SWD Issue Tracker wrote: > >> ISSUE-133: Last Call Comment: domain of skos:inScheme >> >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/133 >> >> Raised by: Alistair Miles >> On product: SKOS >> >> Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]: >> >> """ >> Maybe I missed it, but I don't see what the domain is for skos:inScheme. I would >> expect skos:Concept, but it's neither explicitly stated, nor do I see how it can >> be inferred. If it's inferred, or if the domain is intended to be unrestricted, >> something should be said in the "Notes" section below. >> """ >> > > We propose to make an editorial change to the SKOS Reference, adding a > note to the end of section 4 along the lines of: > > """ > 4.6.5. Domain of skos:inScheme > > Note that no domain is stated for the property skos:inScheme. I.e. the > domain is effectively the class of all resources (rdfs:Resource). The > decision not to state any domain has been made to provide some > flexibility, enabling extensions to SKOS to define new classes of > resource but still use skos:inScheme to link them to a > skos:ConceptScheme. See also Example 84 below. > """ > > Also note that example 84 in section A.2.4.2 illustrates the use of > skos:inScheme with skosxl:Label. > > Does this satisfy your concerns? > > Kind regards, > > Alistair > Sean > > >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 19:10:16 UTC