W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: Why is range of skos:member unspecified?

From: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:14:24 +0100
To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Cc: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20081008091424.GC10668@skiathos>

Apologies for extremely late reply...

On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:19:45AM +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote:
>
> Second thought
>
> A member can also be a Collection, so can the range of skos:member be  
> specified as the union of skos:Concept and skos:Collection?

Yes, but do you see any value in explicitly stating the range?

Cheers,

Alistair.

>
> Bernard Vatant a écrit :
>> In http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#L3312
>> Domain of skos:member is specified, but not its range
>> Is that a bug or a feature?
>>
>> Why not : skos:member      rdfs:range      skos:Concept ?
>>
>> Bernard
>>
>
> -- 
>
> *Bernard Vatant
> *Knowledge Engineering
> ----------------------------------------------------
> *Mondeca**
> *3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
> Web:    www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tel:       +33 (0) 971 488 459
> Mail:     bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
> Blog:    Leçons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/>
>
>
>

-- 
Alistair Miles
Senior Computing Officer
Image Bioinformatics Research Group
Department of Zoology
The Tinbergen Building
University of Oxford
South Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3PS
United Kingdom
Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2008 09:15:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 October 2008 09:15:08 GMT