W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > October 2008

ISSUE-158 draft response

From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:15:05 +0100
Message-Id: <1120CF8C-AFC5-4536-865C-EB328459E2EC@manchester.ac.uk>
To: SWD Working SWD <public-swd-wg@w3.org>


Hi all,

Here's a draft response to Peter on [ISSUE-158], let me know what you
think. Note *this is just a draft, not the actual response* -- I'll
wait for feedback from the WG before replying formally to
Peter. (Peter if you're lurking on this list feel free to post your
thoughts at any time.)

	Sean


Dear Peter

Thank you for your comments [1]:

The introduction uses some sophisticated Turtle constructs without even
any mention of the syntax being used.  At least a pointer is required
here.

-------------------------------------------------------------

The Turtle document is cited and referenced in Section 1.2. There are  
also brief explanations in Sections 1.7.3 and 9.5. However, this is a  
reasonable observation. Would moving these explanations into the  
introduction address your concerns?

Cheers,

	Sean Bechhofer
	Alistair Miles

[ISSUE-158] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/158
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0018.html


--
Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 16:14:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 2 October 2008 16:14:55 GMT