W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: Comments on SKOS namespace change question

From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:22:36 +0100
Message-Id: <173925ED-F4F5-48CB-9D09-E6FD531E4C00@manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: SWD Working SWD <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>


Dear Tim,

Thanks again for your comments which have been raised as ISSUE-153.  
The Working
Group's issue tracker system is online at:

   http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/

We hope to respond by Friday 10th October.

Kind regards,

Sean Bechhofer

On 30 Sep 2008, at 20:52, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:

>
>
> Reading http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos-reference-20080829/ ,
>
> I sympathize very much with the people who want to keep the  
> namespace the same.
>  We're trying to get critical mass and cutting some of the data off  
> and letting it float away by itself it is costly. I don't generate  
> skos myself, but I have come across it.
>
> Some people think it's important. I strongly suggest giving new  
> names (within the same namespace)  to the five things which have  
> changed, especially if they're rather obscure.
>
> You have of course to evaluate the damage if you were to just make  
> an erratum to skos 2005.
>
> Did you in 2005 make a say about the change rules for skos 2005
> I suggest to use new names and not change the namespace.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>

--
Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 09:22:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 2 October 2008 09:22:30 GMT