W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition

From: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:46:32 +0000
To: Erik Hennum <ehennum@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20081106094631.GS12933@skiathos>

Dear Erik,

Thank you for your helpful comments. In response to the comment below:

On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 09:20:03PM +0000, SWD Issue Tracker wrote:
> 
> 
> ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/151
> 
> Raised by:  Everyone
> On product: All
> 
> Raised by Erik Hennum in [1]:
> 
> """
> Should the specification define skos:member as having a range of
> skos:Concept or skos:Collection? Should skos:member have an inverse
> skos:isMemberOf property?
> """

We propose to state the range of skos:member as the union of
skos:Concept and skos:Collection. We hope this will clarify the
intended use of the SKOS collections framework. Is this acceptable?

We have not encountered a requirement for an inverse of
skos:member. We propose to make no change, can you live with this?

Kind regards,

Alistair
Sean

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jun/0103.html

-- 
Alistair Miles
Senior Computing Officer
Image Bioinformatics Research Group
Department of Zoology
The Tinbergen Building
University of Oxford
South Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3PS
United Kingdom
Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 09:47:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 6 November 2008 09:47:16 GMT