W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > May 2008

RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-71, ISSUE-74 preparation for Washington

From: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 16:08:10 +0100
To: "'Antoine Isaac'" <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000301c8ab9d$2b6b8120$82428360$@miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>

Hi Antoine,

Thanks a lot for your comments.

I've moved the content out of the Agenda and into a separate wiki page at
<http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/WashingtonAgenda/MappingIssues>. More
inline below...

> The example on KOS extension is slightly
> different from the way we had put it in the Primer  [1], but the usage
> of broader has the same fundamental feature there.

I've modified the discussion of kos extension to include the pattern given
in the primer.

> Maybe there is an editorial problem with the sentence "Another way of
> looking at the usage question is from the point of view of an
> application." It is not part of the previous usage scenario anymore,
> isn't it?

Now under a separate heading.

> There is also ambiguity with the "first definitions" and "second
> definitions": are they def 1-2 and the one side, and def 3-4 on the
> other side? If yes then I don't understand why 3 would be less flexible
> as you put it.

I dropped this discussion, it was confusing me!

> Also, you write about three main options for these definitions, while
> they are four ;-)

That was a typo, actually the fourth option only occurred to me later :)

Cheers,

Alistair.



> 
> My final comment would be formal: making all of this in a same wiki
> page
> seems to me a bit long. Maybe a link to a different wiki page would be
> clearer, even if then we take the risk of people not printing/reading
> the linked pages ;-).
> I let you and the other decide. But depending on your choice, I'll also
> include the discussion on skos:subject as a technical issue...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Antoine
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos-primer-20080221/#secextension
> 
> > Hi Antoine,
> >
> > I've had a go at preparing for the discussion of issues 71 and 74
> next week,
> > it's written up as a sub-section under "Technical Issues" on the
> Washington
> > agenda wiki page
> <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/WashingtonAgenda>. I
> > know you said you won't have any more time between now and then, but
> if you
> > do get a chance, any thoughts you have on how to break this issue up
> and
> > structure the discussion/decision space would be really great. I
> found this
> > one really hard to break down clearly.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Alistair.
> >
> > --
> > Alistair Miles
> > Senior Computing Officer
> > Image Bioinformatics Research Group
> > Department of Zoology
> > The Tinbergen Building
> > University of Oxford
> > South Parks Road
> > Oxford
> > OX1 3PS
> > United Kingdom
> > Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
> > Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk
> > Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 

--
Alistair Miles
Senior Computing Officer
Image Bioinformatics Research Group
Department of Zoology
The Tinbergen Building
University of Oxford
South Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3PS
United Kingdom
Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2008 15:08:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 May 2008 15:08:53 GMT