- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:24:11 -0500
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de>, <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
At 11:17 AM 1/31/2008 +0000, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: >This [duplicate prefLabel, missing altLabel] is a typo, can it be >fixed in place or do we have to wait for the next WD? This isn't the sort of error that we like to fix in place after a TR has been published; only broken markup and broken links. Once a specification has reached Last Call we like to add a link to an errata document. (And this link is required when the spec reaches Recommendation.) There's no particular reason not to include such a link in earlier Working Drafts, -- e.g. the next one : -- at the editors' discretion. Looking at the SOTD section (which I expanded a bit from the Editors' Draft), I don't see an obvious hook for us to connect errata from this version. Had I given it a few minutes more thought, I would have included a link to the open issue tracker [1]. Then we could open a single issue for such notes. [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/products/3 Guus expressed a preference to only open technical issues in tracker and not editorial ones. We might persuade him to change his opinion or you could just create a Wiki page (which we'll link from the WG home page) to hold editorial notes.
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 15:25:20 UTC